On Thursday, June 18, 2026, Morena local deputy Nay Salvatori Bojalil stirred controversy on social media after posting an urgent request for a platelet donor, offering a “gratification” as compensation. This move quickly drew criticism from users who pointed out that Mexican law prohibits any financial benefit in blood or tissue donations.

In a story shared on her social media, Salvatori wrote: “Urgently looking for a platelet donor, offering a gratification for the support and help. Urgent. Info 2211822024.”

The post triggered a wave of reactions, including a pointed reminder from user Assenet Lavalle, who cited Article 462 of the General Health Law. This article criminalizes the sale of blood and related components, with penalties ranging from six to seventeen years in prison. Lavalle urged the deputy to stop promoting what is considered a federal offense, emphasizing that “gratifications” fall under this prohibition.

Many commenters echoed this concern, stressing that blood and platelet donations must be voluntary and altruistic, without any form of economic compensation. The debate highlights the delicate balance between urgent medical needs and the legal framework designed to protect donors and recipients alike.

While the urgency of Salvatori’s request reflects real challenges in accessing lifesaving components like platelets, the controversy underscores the importance of adhering to laws that safeguard ethical donation practices. For communities relying on public health systems, transparent and lawful approaches to donation remain essential.

This incident also invites reflection on how public figures communicate about health emergencies and the role of the state in ensuring both access and regulation in critical medical services.