On Thursday, June 18, 2026, Minister Loretta Ortiz Ahlf of Mexico’s Supreme Court became a viral sensation after claiming during a court session that “all inclusive” hotels exclude Mexican nationals and are meant only for foreigners.

The remark came up amid a debate about beach access, tourism spaces, and the use of national assets. Videos circulating on social media show Ortiz apparently taking the term “all inclusive” literally, misunderstanding it as a restriction based on nationality rather than a hospitality package.

During the session, someone handed her a handwritten note explaining the true meaning of “all inclusive” — a widely used term in the global tourism industry that refers to hotels offering lodging, food, drinks, and other services bundled into a single price, regardless of guests’ nationality.

This moment quickly spread across platforms like X and Facebook, sparking memes, ironic comments, and questions about the preparedness of some Supreme Court members. The fact that the clarification came via a note during the live session only fueled the online reaction.

For context, Mexico is a top destination for “all inclusive” resorts, especially in places like Cancún, Riviera Maya, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, and Huatulco, where both Mexican citizens and international visitors enjoy these packages.

So far, Minister Ortiz has not publicly addressed the backlash from her statement. This incident highlights the growing public interest in the Supreme Court’s new composition, whose sessions are now broadcast live and closely followed by citizens and social media users alike.

While the comment raised eyebrows, it’s worth remembering that inclusive and accessible tourism remains a key part of Mexico’s economic and social fabric — a principle that aligns with broader efforts to promote equitable access to national resources and services.